Westspit Braddock Bay

Sunday, October 26, 2014

Ecohydrology issues are solved locally ... at the scale of the watershed

Salmon Creek Hilton NY
There is new thinking in the area characterized by 'ecosystems' which might be termed 'ecohydrology.' There are other terms as well including 'water nexus' which refer to the dynamics of land and water.

We're in a new, climate-shifting pattern of weather and its effects on earth. It is unmistakable, but we are players in this interaction and what we do counts.

"The solutions to the global water crisis can't be global," says Dr. Karen Bakker of the University of British Columbia's Program on Water Governance at the University's Institute for Resources, Environment and Sustainability. Dr. Bakker teaches an edX course, Blue is the New Green

"The solutions are necessarily local. They're going to operate at the scale of the watershed."  If that is the case, I have been watching the evolution of 'local' to mean 'superseded' by more and more agencies. For instance, what happened in legislation and agreements decades ago dictates today:  "Lakewide Management Plans (LaMPs) stem from the 1987 amendments to the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement, originally signed by the United States and Canada in 1972. This historic agreement committed both countries 'to restore and maintain the chemical, physical and biological integrity of the waters of the Great Lakes basin ecosystem.' To meet this commitment, the two governments agreed to develop and implement LaMPs for open lake waters and Remedial Action Plans (RAPs) for specific geographic Areas of Concern (AOCs). LaMPs are intended to identify critical pollutants that affect beneficial uses of the lakes and to present strategies, recommendations and policy options to restore those beneficial uses. LaMPs for lakes Erie, Michigan, Ontario and Superior have been developed with guidance from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and Environment Canada. Through an iterative approach, these documents will be updated and re-released every two years to incorporate new data and public input."  Overlapping and confusing . . . . 

Saturday, October 25, 2014

"Restoration" the new buzz word for wetlands


Hunting in America is big business, generating more than $67 billion in economic output and more than one million jobs in the United States according to the International Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies.  Read more about the economic impact of hunting: http://www.fishwildlife.org/files/Hunting_Economic_Impact.pdf

New York State is considered part of the Atlantic flyway in North America. Generally birds do not fly directly across Lake Ontario's 60 miles of open water, but skirt the edges.  

One of the most moneyed pockets of support for 'restoration of wetlands' is Ducks Unlmited, a national organization with 600,000 members and based in Tennesee. The DU members are hunters who believe in conservation and now 'restoration' of wetlands.  Buoyed by the hundreds of millions of dollars being handed out by the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative, DU has been awarded grants in New York State.

Among the projects funded by GLRI is one located at Braddock Bay.  "The conservation methods proposed at Braddock Bay FWMA and Lake Shore Marshes WMA [eastward to Oswego area along L. Ontario] have been successfully implemented in other parts of the Lake Ontario basin to improve fish and wildlife habitat. Preliminary results of projects on French Creek WMA, Lakeview Marshes WMA, and on private lands in Jefferson County show positive ecological benefits from channel and pothole excavation in cattail stands," says Ducks Unlimited.  

"DU received funding for this project through the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative, North America Wetlands Conservation Act, and private donations from Constellation Energy. Partners include the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, New York Department of Environmental Conservation, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Great Lakes Basin Fish Habitat Partnership, Fresh Water Futures, Friends of Montezuma Wetlands Complex, Montezuma Audubon, Town of Greece, the Nature Conservancy, Braddock Bay Fish and Wildlife Management Area Committee, Town of Greece Parks, and Lake Plains Waterfowl Association."  Read more about what DU is pushing in NYS: http://www.ducks.org/new-york/du-to-restore-lake-ontario-wetlands-in-new-york

Wednesday, October 22, 2014

Residents of Braddock Bay hear little of project details; questions remain


About 300 residents attended a meeting at the Greece Town Hall Oct. 22 at which a spokesman from the Army Corps of Engineers talked about a proposed project which would place a permanent breakwall across a portion of Braddock Bay extending from the eastern side into the mouth of the bay.  

Expert Doug Wilcox, professor at SUNY Brockport, stated that Braddock Bay had a 'barrier beach' long ago, but upon questioning, could not point to a photograph or map that showed a barrier beach across the mouth of the bay.  It was the presence of this 'barrier beach' that kept the wetland healthy asserted Mr. Wilcox and this was backed up by the Army Corps representative who pointed to the 'erosion of the barrier beach' as the reason for the breakwall construction.  NOTE: THE US ARMY CORPS in Buffalo 'thinks' that there was a 'barrier beach' across Braddock Bay: "The barrier beach will be restored  ?? What if there NEVER was a 'barrier beach'?? 
Lines courtesy US Army Corps/Buffalo
Braddock Bay-Is this correct? 
Fisherpeople say 'no.' Bay looks 
today like it did 30 years ago:
"Hunting blinds are still in exactly 
the same place against shoreline,"
- Bay hunter.

"The barrier would never have completely blocked off the bay from the lake because Salmon Creek water has to reach the lake," Professor Wilcox said in a correspondence after the public meeting.  "As I have been told by others, the trolley line used the barrier as the foundation to follow in crossing the bay, like Edgemere Drive uses the barrier as its foundation. Loss of the barrier beach is the hydrologic change that has affected the bay.  With no barrier, sand in the littoral drift is able to sweep into the bay.  With no barrier, wave action keeps water in the bay turbid."  Huh? Don't you want to keep the bay 'turbid' to retain marshland which is built by sedimentation?

Additional questioning by residents to Mr. Wilcox about how the War of 1812 brigantines entered Braddock Bay harbor brought shrugs on the part of  the professor.  Apparently there was an adequate channel at one time through which deep water boats entered.  Subsequently in the late 1800s the now-submerged Manitou Trolley foundation was built entirely across the mouth of the bay and the rails were suspended over the bay on pilings. The trolley foundation still remains and serves as a natural barrier beach for the bay.

Representatives from the EPA, the Rochester Embayment and other agencies were available to answer questions, but there was no public Q & A.  To make a public comment to the US Army Corps, go to the contact on the Army Corps website: http://bit.ly/BraddockBay or to the EPA: Fred Luckey (luckey.frederick@epa.gov212-637-3853  or  Brenda Jones (jones.brenda@epa.gov312-886-7188, both of whom were at meeting.

Tuesday, October 14, 2014

Braddock Bay - Public Hearing Oct. 22, 2014 @ Greece NY Town Hall

Public is encouraged to attend: Wednesday, Oct. 22, 2014, 6:30 pm Town Hall, Greece, Long Pond Rd. -- US. Army Corps/Town of Greece want to permanently block half the mouth of Braddock Bay. Be there!!  Don't underestimate the importance of the Bay and any major alterations to its hydrology. Braddock Bay is a freshwater estuary . . . defined as a 'semi-enclosed area where combinations of river/creek and lake water mix and are storm-driven.' In the Great Lakes, the water level changes due to a seiche ['sloshing about' of Great Lakes] which also mixes water from inflow and lake.

My opinion: The Bay is much more fragile than the Town of Greece and the Army Corps are giving it credit for. The Bay can and will turn into a muck hole if a permanent breakwall barrier is placed at its mouth. The Bay is 10,000 years old and it is the only one of the five water features in the DEC Management Area with two major incoming watersheds that drain directly into the bay: Salmon Creek and Buttonwood Creek. It is the only water feature in the WMA with an incredible hydrologic feature, the west spit, which dives underwater and is reinforced by the 100-year old Manitou Trolley foundation which extends across the entire mouth of the bay. It is this old underwater foundation that is working positively for the bay's health. The wave action from storms coming in from all directions combined with the creek inflow make it a rich bay and yet, still quite fragile. Fisherpeople on the Bay tell me to 'keep the channel dredged' -- 'don't obstruct the mouth with a cement barrier.' I am knowledgeable of almost every different kind of beach and man-made barrier, pier, jetty, break wall, etc. that can be built as I have surfed and dove off the coast of California and Mexico. I will predict that this permanent barrier will destroy the bay. Water has the last say. Water flow and wave action actually are our greatest asset in protecting the continued existence of the Bay. There is not one reason to mess with this natural hydrology unless you 'want to play god' and cause an increased level of silt, sand and encroaching vegetation to kill the bay as we know it. - Barbara Carder, 330 Manitou Beach Rd., Hilton, NY 14468


Saturday, October 11, 2014

Natural barriers, sandbars . . . . don't ignore their beauty and function



Wikimedia
Why should it matter that our Braddock Bay has a strong sandbar at its mouth, strengthened 100 years ago by the Manitou Trolley foundation?  Look at Japan's two-mile-long Amanohashidate sandbar on Miyazo Bay, a dynamically-stable sandbar. Considered a national treasure, the sandbar continues to be stable over the tens of centuries. A spit such as Braddock Bay's 'Westspit" is defined as a 'deposition landform' - connecting to a head and one end and a 'nose' at the other, it is formed when longshore drifting [or littoral drift] waves meet the beach at an oblique angle moving sand along in a zigzag pattern.  Braddock Bay's Westspit is a beautiful phenomenon.  Channel markers and a dredged channel permit vessels access. NYS's DEC agrees: http://www.dec.ny.gov/outdoor/24428.html 

NOTE: the older sandbar has closed off the mouth of several ponds. Braddock Bay is the only one left with healthy hydrology.  Photographer David Beadling has caught the Bay perfectly: http://www.braddockbaygallery.com/braddockbay.htm


Scientists have intensely studied shoreline morphology [form and structure]: "Sandbars play an important role in beach stability since they reduce the energy of waves by breaking them, thereby preventing severe erosion . . . such dynamically stable sandbars effectively contribute to disaster mitigation . . . ." American Geophysical Union, Fall Meeting 2013, abstract #EP13A-0826


Sunday, October 05, 2014

Don't Turn Braddock Bay into a Muck Hole

View from east; Salmon Ck. at top. 
Notice the natural hydrology of the  Bay


WHAT: One of the few bays and marshland complexes on the southern shore of L. Ontario in NYS which is and has been holding its own for over ten thousand years!! 


ALERT: How much science and how much politics are involved in the proposed Army Corps project which is slated to place a permanent barrier across half of the mouth of Braddock Bay, part of the 2,600-acre Braddock Bay Wildlife Management Area managed by NYS Department of Environmental Conservation.  

Yet, the Town of Greece has long had its eye on "Shoreline Protection" in its LWRP [Local Waterfront Revitalization] https://greeceny.gov/files/23~Chapter%205-Proposed%20Projects.pdf: "Construct a shoreline protective feature at Braddock Bay to PROTECT THE SENSITIVE SHORELINE from continued recession and to restore historic sedimentation patterns to the bay."  Read: cement breakwall and nod to property owners - even though there is no residential property on the baymouth area.

HOW BRADDOCK BAY [WHICH IS IN THE SALMON CREEK WATERSHED] GOT LUMPED WITH THE GENESEE  RIVER [ROCHESTER EMBAYMENT']; clue - it's about getting $$: 
http://www.epa.gov/glnpo/lakeont/2013/201308-lamp-ontario.pdf

WHO IS PUSHING THIS US Army Corps Project through and why: GET THE FACTS: http://www.epa.gov/glnpo/aoc/rochester/index.html  This project is being encouraged by NY Senator Chuck Schumer:  http://www.schumer.senate.gov/record.cfm?id=350539& the EPA funded the US Army Corps of Engineers out of Buffalo to ostensibly [and in report] "reduce erosion of the existing emergent marsh."-- Yet everyone can see, the cattail marsh is encroaching -- not eroding the bay http://www.lrb.usace.army.mil/Missions/CivilWorks/DistrictProjects/BraddockBay.aspx  Read the "Feasibility Study": http://cdm16021.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/compoundobject/collection/p16021coll7/id/910/rec/5

RED FLAG:  proposed $9M funding via the EPA with Great Lakes Regional Initiative for the Army Corps might effectively destroy the bay.  Don't underestimate how massive this barrier is: http://www.lrb.usace.army.mil/Portals/45/docs/BraddockBay/Braddock-Bay-Poster02.pdf

WHY: The hydrology the Bay works to keep it alive due to both wave action and incoming creeks - Salmon Creek and Buttonwood Ck.  A natural barrier already exists at the mouth of the bay: the submerged 100-year-old foundation of the trolley bed which is locally called "The West Spit". This has an ameliorating effect on the storms coming in from all directions. The hydrology the bay is working to keep it alive due to both wave action and incoming creeks - Salmon Creek and Buttonwood Ck. A barrier will permanently alter this hydrology negatively. 

NOT being taken into account:
  • Why not consider existing rip-rap rock barrier on eastside extension of Edgemere Dr. along old trolley bed as your primary 'stabilizing' structure rather than extending anything into mouth of bay. Proposed barrier [concrete headland] will have detrimental effect if you take into consideration the silt, etc. from Buttonwood, Salmon creeks and tributaries as well as year-round wave action coming in from Lake Ontario -- including winter storms piling up sand at least a mile out onto west spit and its extension underwater across mouth of bay;
  • Don't keep moving the sand/dirt from the old Manitou trolley foundation on the westside [as is being done now by 'testing'] as it provides a natural, wave-endured barrier and without it, more sand, silt will enter the bay proper;
  • Think of the west spit as a natural habitat resource --- the spit is both underwater and extends into upland maintaining a less severe wave action coming in from westerly, northwesterly and northerly storms -- keep that there!
  • Find out from Montezuma if 'potholes' work or are just immediately filled in by invasives -purple loosetrife -- you could make the bay marsh worse!  Cattails and bull rush have been in the bay and ponds forever, but still, the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative wants to 'clean it up' and even funded Ducks Unlimited for $499,627.00 to do just that!!  
  • Realize that there NEVER will be habitat renewal in the bay proper -- ONLY THE UPSTREAM WATERSHED -- because of the water level 'up and down' of L. Ontario due to St. Lawrence Seaway and Ontario Hydro at Niagara Falls --- it will always be cattail -- better than MUCK!
"Just dig or dredge the channel -- that's it -- that's all we're asking" - Long-time fisherman and resident on Bayview Dr. on Braddock Bay.


Monday, September 15, 2014

West Spit History

Hotel Manitou
Turn of the 20th Century

The storied and memorable past of Hilton NY's "Manitou Beach" included a trolley across the mouth of Braddock Bay across the west spit and past the Hotel Manitou. 

An amusement park, a baseball field for the "Hilton Peaches," the Elmheart Hotel, Odenbach's Dance Hall, rum runners and and lines of carriages along Manitou Beach Rd. . . . . it had to have been a wonderful time.  

The map of old Manitou Beach shows the west spit and environs in 1924. The original piers are still there as well as some old breakwaters.

The Manitou Beach point is "Braddock Point" but the Lighthouse Service placed the "Braddock Point Lighthouse" three miles to the west on "Bogus Point."  

The Manitou Trolley and its piers, many of which are still embedded in the causeway across the mouth of Braddock Bay, must have been an incredible journey in 1890 from Rochester to the wilds of the lake. 

Boaters have long encountered the old pilings submerged across the mouth of Braddock Bay and embedded in the rubble used to anchor them.

The open mouth of the Bay from time immemorial - or at least the past 10,000 years - will be damaged by the Town of Greece/Army Corps project to place breakwalls across the baymouth and dredge a channel for boaters.  

Greenwashing at its best: all for the black tern . . . . .

"A Tern for the Better at Braddock Bay" 
Black Tern - Montezuma National Wildlife Refuge © D. Sherony
Black Tern – Montezuma National Wildlife Refuge © D. Sherony
by Jim Ochterski, Rochester Birding Association Conservation Committee  appearing http://rochesterbirding.com  July 2014 

Braddock Bay, just west of Rochester NY, is so well known for its hawk migration observation platform that many people forget that it is , in fact a bay. [!]  Bays are inlets of water alongside large lakes or the ocean.  The mixing of landforms opens up many combinations of dry land, partially submersed land, mud flats, dense plants, trees, and stretches of open water.  Bays are one of the most desirable habitats for migrating and breeding birds because they offer shelter, abundant food sources, and diverse nesting areas.  Braddock Bay is part of a larger complex of inlets and ponds that are sometimes directly connected to Lake Ontario and sometimes not.  Gravel and is shifted by lake currents and pounding waves, creating bars and channels.  When lake level regulation began in the 1950’s to improve commercial ship navigation through the St. Lawrence Seaway, the natural shifting was disrupted and before long, the system was almost continuously flooded.  In the wake of Hurricane Agnes, a formidable sand bar barrier was washed away, and erosion has been hitting the lake side of Braddock Bay very hard. [WHAT!! THERE IS A NATURAL SAND BARRIER ALONG THE LAKE ONTARIO SIDE—PILES UP AGAINST THE MANITOU TROLLEY FOUNDATION] 


When years of continuous flooding, erosion, and human activity combine in a freshwater area, you can expect one thing to thrive: cattails.  A fast-growing, adaptable, and nearly invasive native plant, cattails fill in most shallow water areas completely.  In Braddock Bay, the cattails have formed a nearly lifeless monoculture. [REALLY?]  They help stabilize sediments and are home to some species, but a lot of the habitat richness that once characterized the Bay is now gone.  Cattails can do this because the fluctuation of water levels is very limited now.  Cattails can invade former diverse meadow marshes because sustained lake levels allow them to survive and overtake sedges and grasses that otherwise put up with the frequent drier soil conditions when lake levels fluctuated naturally.

Fortunately, habitat decline in Braddock Bay caught the attention of a rather formidable force: the US Army Corps of Engineers.  In a partnership with the NYS Department of Environmental Conservation, Ducks Unlimited, the Nature Conservancy of Central and Western New York, and the Town of Greece, the Army Corps of Engineers is studying how, when, and where to build, dig, and dredge to finagle some improved coastal habitat.  The target species of all this work (an indicator of success) is the Black tern.
Black terns have not nested in Braddock Bay in almost a generation.  Even though preferred Black tern habitat is rich in cattails, they require other plant species as well, such as rushes, sedges, and cord grasses.   In other words, cattail monocultures are not desirable, and will not support a colonial nesting species like the Black tern.
So, the US Army Corps of Engineers is now conducting a feasibility study to explore if the construction of an artificial headland breakwater, the scooping of deeper potholes into the bay, and re-channeling areas through the cattails will bring in plant species to restore Braddock Bay.  If the habitat can be so modified that Black terns return as an easy-to-spot nesting species, there should be enough habitat available for other species of birds and mammals.

In the words of the US Army Corps:  “The goal of [Braddock Bay] restoration is to improve habitat diversity of the existing emergent marsh currently dominated by cattail, and to reduce erosion of the existing emergent marsh. The black tern was chosen as a target species for habitat restoration, because it represents a historic habitat no longer present in the bay. This habitat, characterized by diverse aquatic vegetation zones, sedge grass meadows, and open water areas interspersed within a matrix of emergent marsh, will be significantly more ecologically diverse than the existing cattail dominated emergent wetland and would provide high quality habitat for many species of fish and wildlife including American mink and northern pike.” During your next visit to Braddock Bay, look at the lackluster stand of cattails.  Imagine in their place a multi-faceted marsh habitat with swooping Black terns and hovering Northern harriers.  Then, look to the migrating hawks (mere specks in the sky) and delight in a possible turn for the better.

Thursday, September 04, 2014

Braddock Bay ~ Town of Greece NY 2014

Watching a small barge with an even smaller crane pull apart the submerged west spit as it morphs into the old Manitou Trolley bed under the western mouth of Braddock Bay
Economic development?  .  .  .  Habitat Restoration? . . . . Recreation? . . . . What is going on?  West spit of Braddock Bay, at right, where waves wash up and over submerged trolley bed. 

US Army Corps of Engineers proposal:
Braddock Bay, NY - Coastal Wetland Restoration 
from the report . . . . . "Nearshore / Non-Point Source Focus Area 
Project Location: Braddock Bay is located on the shore of Lake Ontario within the Great Lakes Rochester Embayment Area of Concern (AoC) in the town of Greece in Monroe County, New York. 
Project Description: "The project goal is restoration and protection of 340 acres of coastal wetlands. The project will enhance wetland habitat, treat invasive species, and improve coastal resiliency of existing wetlands by restoring the historic barrier beach. Potential project alternatives involve restoration of an extensive network of channels and potholes that will increase habitat interspersion, complexity, and diversity; as well as restoration of the former barrier beach to protect the bay from wave energy and reduce erosion of existing wetlands. 
Non-Federal Partner: No cost share sponsor is required for the current Feasibility Study. Funding is provided by the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative (GLRI) through USEPA and is 100% Federal. Both the Town of Greece and New York State Department of Conservation support implementation. REALLY!! 
Project Benefits: The project benefits include: contributing to the delisting the Rochester Embayment Great Lakes Area of Concern (AoC) Beneficial Use Impairments (BUIs) for both (1) degradation of fish and wildlife populations and (2) loss of fish and wildlife habitat, contributing to the Lake Ontario Lakewide Management Plan (LaMP) goal to maintain/restore ecosystem to support self-reproducing diverse biological communities, and restoring habitat for the New York State endangered black tern that has not nested there since 1998. 
Project Status: USACE is conducting a feasibility study of alternatives for ecosystem restoration at Braddock Bay. A draft feasibility study report was presented to the Rochester." 

Monday, August 25, 2014

What is the US doing to address the Great Lakes?

Priorities: contaminated sewer overflow...invasive species...toxic contaminants in sediments ... protection of drinking water... economic impact of tourism, fisheries, wildlife and other industries relying on Great Lakes


A Congressional Legislative Hearing before the Committee on Environment and Public Works was held July 16, 2014.  To track these bills: Library of Congress bill tracking website.   

• The Great Lakes Water Protection Act, S. 571, addresses sewer overflows. The measure, authored by Sen. Mark Kirk, R-Ill., would ban the sewer overflows that pour contaminated water into the lakes. After 2033, counties, cities and other political entities
West Spit Braddock Bay NY
would face increasingly steep fines for overflows. The bill would also mandate standard methods for publicly reporting sewer overflows. At present, the Great Lakes states don't have a uniform approach now for getting such news out promptly. 
There's an identical bill in the House, H.R. 1185.
• The Invasive Fish and Wildlife Prevention Act, S. 1153, would speed up the federal government's review process when it considers whether to ban the importation of animals and plants. Current screening takes more than four years to complete. In the Illinois River, where Asian carp infestation is extreme, 90 percent of the river’s biomass is now Asian carpThe measure is authored by Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y. The House version of the legislation, H.R. 996, lists U.S. Rep. Marcy Kaptur, D-Toledo, as a co-sponsor. For more: NY Invasive Species.
• The Great Lakes Ecological and Economic Protection Act, S. 1232. The measure, authored by Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich., and co-sponsored by Sen. Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio, would reauthorize the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative, an Obama administration program which has provided $300 million a year for the last four years for programs to clean up the lakes. It would also reauthorize the Great Lakes National Program Office, the main Environmental Protection Agency office for Great Lakes matters, and the Great Lakes Legacy Program, which removes contaminated sediment from polluted areas. The bill also would authorize the Federal Great Lakes Interagency Task Force, which pulls together different federal agencies to help the Great Lakes.  To see where the money goes in the Rochester NY area: Great Lakes Restoration Initiative projects at Braddock Bay, area beaches and wetlands.  

Among those testifying was Policy Director of Healing Our Waters the Great Lakes Coalition: testimony is available at the National Parks Conservation Association site. The Great Lakes Coalition was formed in 2004. The Healing Our Waters-Great Lakes Coalition is led by the National Wildlife Federation and the National Parks Conservation Association. The Coalition has staff in Washington, D.C., Ann Arbor, Michigan, Madison, Wisconsin, and Chicago, Illinois.  From the Sandusky, Ohio Register, July 18, 2014.

L. Ontario Waterkeeper ~ Canada, Ontario and the shared 'Lake of Shining Waters'

How much commitment has Canada made to Lake Ontario?  They are worried according to this recent article "Lake of Shame...Ontario's Pollution Problem"  especially about Toronto's old and polluting sewer system. "Lake Ontario is the 14th largest lake in the world: 19,529 square kilometres, 1,146 kilometres of shoreline, 244 metres at its deepest.  Which is one reason it’s not a total cesspool, experts say.  Its size and depth help dissipate the bacteria, which our drinking-water filtration plants kill off with chlorine. But what about the agricultural runoff? The sewage? The industrial sludge? The nuclear waste? The pesticides? Herbicides? Road salt? The toxic by-products of burning medical and municipal waste? The engine oil you poured down the storm sewer? The leftover prescription pills you flushed down the toilet?" . . . From The Star July 8, 2011.

Quick Facts about L. Ontario from Canadian perspective

  • Lake Ontario provides drinking water to 9-million people [in Canada]. The entire Great Lakes system provides water for 30 million people.
  • More Canadians live in the Lake Ontario watershed than any other watershed in the country.
  • The lake never completely freezes because it is so deep. The surface of Lake Ontario has frozen over at least five times, the last time in 1934.
  • Lake Ontario has a “seiche”, a natural rhythmic motion as water sloshes back and forth every 11 minutes.
  • Glaciers formed the lake between 14,000 and 10,000 years ago.
  • The lake is one of the five Great Lakes, which 21% of the world’s surface freshwater.
  • Lake Ontario is the 14th largest lake in the world.
  • All Great Lakes water flows through Lake Ontario before it flows to the Atlantic Ocean.
  • Water takes about 6 years to flow through Lake Ontario to the St. Lawrence River
  • Lake Ontario is the most threatened Great Lake.
  • Niagara Falls pours into Lake Ontario.
  • Iroquois and Huron First Nations lived on the lake for thousands of years before Europeans arrived.
  • “Lake Ontario” means “lake of shining waters”.
  • Commercial fishing peaked in the late 1880s; 130 years later, government and NGOs are still working to restore the lake’s native fish populations.
  • Lake Ontario is partially in Canada, partially in the USA.
  • There used to be 150 species of fish in the Great Lakes.
  • The most common fish in Lake Ontario used to be the American Eel.
  • There are over 100 beaches on Lake Ontario.
For more: the Canadian Waterkeeper website www.waterkeeper.ca . . . . And more from CREATE Great Lakes.

Friday, August 22, 2014

Blue-green cyanobacteria algae and swimming, drinking water

What does the NYS Department of Health say about the algae blooms in the bays and ponds along the southern shore of New York State? "Blue-green algae, technically known as cyanobacteria, are microscopic organisms that are naturally present in lakes and streams. They usually are present in low numbers. Blue-green algae can become very abundant in warm, shallow, undisturbed surface water that receives a lot of sunlight. When this occurs, they can form blooms that discolor the water or produce floating rafts or scums on the surface of the water."

"What are the potential health effects from drinking or coming in contact with water containing blue-green algae?"
"Some blue-green algae produce toxins that could pose a health risk to people and animals when they are exposed to them in large enough quantities. Health effects could occur when surface scums or water containing high levels of blue-green algal toxins are swallowed, through contact with the skin or when airborne droplets containing toxins are inhaled while swimming, bathing or showering.
Consuming water containing high levels of blue-green algal toxins has been associated with effects on the liver and on the nervous system in laboratory animals, pets, livestock and people. Livestock and pet deaths have occurred when animals consumed very large amounts of accumulated algal scum from along shorelines.
Direct contact or breathing airborne droplets containing high levels of blue-green algal toxins during swimming or showering can cause irritation of the skin, eyes, nose and throat and inflammation in the respiratory tract.  Recreational contact, such as swimming, and household contact, such as bathing or showering, with water not visibly affected by a bluegreen algae bloom is not expected to cause health effects. However, some individuals could be especially sensitive to even low levels of algal toxins and might experience mild symptoms such as skin, eye or throat irritation or allergic reactions." -- -- posted by Barbara

http://www.health.ny.gov/environmental/water/drinking/bluegreenalgae.htm

Wednesday, July 30, 2014

Sunday, June 22, 2014

Planting native species Viburnum trilobum

High Bush Cranberry in bloom ~ early June
Photography Barbara Carder